Contact info.
 
My Secret Life as a Spaghetti Coder
home | about | contact | privacy statement
JetBrains recently announced that IntelliJ IDEA will be open-sourced and have an Apache 2.0-licensed version with the release of 9.0.

Those who've been reading My Secret Life as a Spaghetti Coder for a long time will know I totally love IDEA.

I haven't written software in Java for quite some time, and I don't normally do "news" posts, but I know enough of you are into Java, Groovy, and Scala to make this worth your while if the $249 was pricey enough to force you into using lesser Java IDEs. Now you don't have to.

Get it and I don't think you'll be disappointed. But don't wait until 10.0. As Cedric Beust pointed out (and I'm inclined to agree), "IDEA going opensource means that it will now slowly die."

I hope not, of course, but one has to wonder.

Hey! Why don't you make your life easier and subscribe to the full post or short blurb RSS feed? I'm so confident you'll love my smelly pasta plate wisdom that I'm offering a no-strings-attached, lifetime money back guarantee!



One step back from greatness lies the very definition of the impossible leadership situation: a president affiliated with a set of established commitments that have in the course of events been called into question as failed or irrelevant responses to the problems of the day... The instinctive political stance of the establishment affiliate -- to affirm and continue the work of the past -- becomes at these moments a threat to the vitality, if not survival, of the nations, and leadership collapses upon a dismal choice. To affirm established commitments is to stigmatize oneself as a symptom of the nation's problems and the premier symbol of systemic political failure; to repudiate them is to become isolated from one's most natural political allies and to be rendered impotent.
Stephen Skowronek, The Politics Presidents Make (pg. 39)


A little while ago Obie asked "What's this crap about a Ruby backlash?" The whole situation has reminded me of Skowronek's work, so I dug a couple of passages up.

We're at a crossroads right now between two regimes - one represented by Java, and the other represented by Ruby (although it is quite a bit more nuanced than that). My belief right now is that Java The Language is in a position where it can't win. People are fed up with the same old crap, and a change is happening (see also: Why Do I Have To Tell The Compiler Twice?, or Adventures in Talking To a Compiler That Doesn't Listen.) More...


This is a story about my journey as a programmer, the major highs and lows I've had along the way, and how this post came to be. It's not about how ecstasy made me a better programmer, so I apologize if that's why you came.

In any case, we'll start at the end, jump to the beginning, and move along back to today. It's long, but I hope the read is as rewarding as the write.

A while back, Reg Braithwaite challenged programing bloggers with three posts he'd love to read (and one that he wouldn't). I loved the idea so much that I've been thinking about all my experiences as a programmer off and on for the last several months, trying to find the links between what I learned from certain languages that made me a better programmer in others, and how they made me better overall. That's how this post came to be. More...


Since the gift buying season is officially upon us, I thought I'd pitch in to the rampant consumerism and list some of the toys I've had a chance to play with this year that would mean fun and learning for the programmer in your life. Plus, the thought of it sounded fun. Here they are, in no particular order other than the one in which I thought of them this morning: More...


When looping over collections, you might find yourself needing elements that match only a certain parameter, rather than all of the elements in the collection. How often do you see something like this?

foreach(x in a)
   if(x < 10)
      doSomething;


Of course, it can get worse, turning into arrow code. More...


I just wanted to highlight a couple of interesting ideas I saw on InfoQ this morning:
  1. Somewhat-open classes in Java: I hadn't known about JavaRebel until now, but it looks interesting. It sounds as if you can do open-class type things, but they don't seem to market it on that aspect - instead, they focus on the time it saves you by not having to "redeploy or restart."
  2. That sounds quite a lot like another language where you're working in the abstract syntax tree itself. So I found it good timing that InfoQ also mentioned several implementations-in-the-works of Lisp on the .NET platform. Hey Grant, why don't you join one of those teams?
Do I have any votes for polyglot programming?


The last bit of advice from Chad Fowler's 52 ways to save your job was to be a generalist, so this week's version is the obvious opposite: to be a specialist.

The intersection point between the two seemingly disparate pieces of advice is that you shouldn't use your lack of experience in multiple technologies to call yourself a specialist in another. Just because you develop in Java to the exclusion of .NET (or anything else) doesn't make you a Java specialist. To call yourself that, you need to be "the authority" on all things Java. More...


If you don't care about the background behind this, the reasons why you might want to use rules based programming, or a bit of theory, you can skip straight the Drools tutorial.

Background
One of the concepts I love to think about (and do) is raising the level of abstraction in a system. The more often you are telling the computer what, and not how, the better.

Of course, somewhere someone is doing imperative programming (telling it how), but I like to try to hide much of that somewhere and focus more on declarative programming (telling it what). Many times, that's the result of abstraction in general and DSLs and rules-based programming more specifically. More...


The first talk I attended at NFJS was Scott Davis's presentation about Groovy, and how it lives up to its name (you know, its grrrooovy baby!) The presentation went through the death of Java, how Groovy fills a need that Java misses, some sample code for utility programs, and finally a short introduction to Grails. Download Groovy As a disclaimer, I give Scott Davis all the credit for the good stuff here. I'm just reporting from my notes, his slides, and my memory, so any mistakes you find are probably mine. If they aren't, they probably should have been. More...


Let me start out by saying the NFJS conference was incredible! I went in with the intention of blogging as the sessions and days went on, but I was incredibly busy, and felt like my notes didn't do justice to the presentations. So I'm going to review the slides and flesh out my comments, and hopefully do a good job at letting you know what went down. More...


Last night John Lam posted about Steve Yegge's port of Rails to JavaScript (Running on Rhino, "JavaScript for Java" on the JVM," not in the browser).

Sounds interesting.

Update: Steve responds and explains how it's not much to get hyped up about.


Last Saturday, I had the fortune of attending the JUnit Workshop put on by Agile Houston. It was great getting to meet and work with some of the developers in the Houston Area. We started a couple of hours late because of a mixup at the hotel, but it was a good chance to chat with the other developers.

I signed up for a story to implement forums for JUnit.org, which would be used to post hard to test code and receive tests for them. The twist was that we wanted to compile the code and run the unit tests that others posted in response against the code, providing pass/fail and code coverage statistics (that sounds a lot harder than it really is). The other set of stories I signed up for was related to articles, news, (something else related to those that I can't recall), and RSS feeds for each of them. More...


This one refers to the 40+ minute presentation by Obie Fernandez on Agile DSL Development in Ruby. (Is InfoQ not one of the greatest resources ever?)

You should really view the video for better details, but I'll give a little rundown of the talk here. Obie starts out talking about how you should design the language first with the domain expert, constantly refining it until it is good - and only then should you worry about implementing it (this is about the same procedure you'd follow if you were building an expert system as well). That's where most of the Agility comes into play. More...


Sean Corfield responded in some depth to "Is Rails easy?", and explained what I wish I could have when I said (awkwardly, rereading it now) "I think my cat probably couldn't [code a Rails app]."

Sean makes it quite clear (as did Venkat's original post) that it isn't that using a framework, technology, or tool in general is easy or hard (although, you can certainly do things to make it easier or harder to use). In many cases, what it does for you is easy to begin with - in the case of Rails, it is stuff you do all the time that amounts to time-wasting, repetitive, boring busy-work. Rather, the right way to look at them is that they are tools that make you more productive, and it takes a while to learn to use them.

If you go into them thinking they are easy, you're likely to be disappointed and drop a tool that can really save you time before you learn to use it. And that could be tragic, if you value your time.


Just a friendly reminder that Agile Houston is hosting a JUnit website improvement workshop on Saturday, June 16, 2007. The workshop starts at 9 AM and continues all day.

It's at the Courtyard Marriott. We'll be TDDing improvements to the JUnit.org website and I should be there from about 9 AM to 3 PM. See you there!


Want to get a report of a certain session? I'll be attending No Fluff Just Stuff in Austin, Texas at the end of June. So, look at all that's available, and let me know what you'd like to see.

I haven't yet decided my schedule, and it's going to be tough to do so. I'm sure to attend some Groovy and JRuby sessions, but I don't know which ones. In any case, I want to try to leave at least a couple of sessions open for requests, so feel free to let me know in the comments what you'd like to see. (No guarantees though!). Here's what I'm toying with so far (apologies in advance for not linking to the talks or the speakers' blogs, there are far too many of them =)): More...


Don't forget to (learn how to) unit test it using XMLUnit.


I take my second weekend in a row (mostly) off of a computer, and look at all the cool things happening!

Adobe releases AIR (previously known as Apollo) and Flex 3 public beta, both products have been on my list of things to do for quite some time, still with no action taken.

Ruby (MRI) released bug fixes in version 1.8.6. JRuby officially went 1.0 (though it has yet to be posted to the website as I write this). And Ruby.NET released version 0.8 (IronRuby uses its scanner and parser, according to the article -- and this happened a couple of days before the weekend). More...


Last night Thomas Enebo announced on Ruby Talk that JRuby 1.0 RC 3 has been released, and that it "will likely be our final release candidate before our 1.0 release."

I'm interested to deploy a web app trying Ruby on Rails with JRuby (or JRuby on Rails, perhaps), and also in experimenting with Sean Corfield's Scripting for CF 8 to run Ruby within ColdFusion.

Anyone else planning to do good things with JRuby?


Kenji HIRANABE (whose signature reads "Japanese translator of 'XP Installed', 'Lean Software Development' and 'Agile Project Management'") just posted a video (with English subtitles) of himself, Matz (creator of Ruby), and Kakutani-san (who translated Bruce Tate's "From Java To Ruby" into Japanese) to his blog. According to Matz (if I heard correctly in the video), Kenji's a "language otaku," so his blog may be worth checking out for all you other language otakus (though, from my brief look at it, it seems focused between his company's product development and more general programming issues).

In any case it's supposed to be a six part series where the "goal is to show that 'Business-Process-Framework-Language' can be instanciated as 'Web2.0-Agile-Rails-Ruby' in a very synergetic manner, but each of the three may have other goals." The first part discusses the history of Java, Ruby, and Agile. I found it interesting and am looking forward to viewing the upcoming parts, so I thought I'd link it here.


Often when we make a change to some code, if it is not properly designed, the result is that cascading changes need to be done throughout the application because bugs will ripple through the system. That's one of the ideas behind why we want to have low coupling between classes. We also have unit testing to combat the effects of this, but let's just suppose we haven't written any, and haven't used JUnit Factory to create regression tests.

Given that there is a lot of code out there that isn't quite perfect, wouldn't it be nice to have a tool that could analyze changes and where they would affect other code? I can imagine how such a tool might work, but I haven't heard of one before now (that I recall, anyway).

So the point of it all: I heard something about BMC and IBM teaming up on such a tool (my understanding is that BMC started it, and IBM later joined the project). I'm assuming it'd be in Java, but does anyone have information on this? Can anyone confirm or deny the story I heard?


Hot off the presses: On Saturday, June 16, 2007 from 9:00 AM (and lasting all day) Agile Houston is hosting a JUnit workshop.

Attendees will be pairing and TDDing improvements to JUnit.org, including: (quoting Agile Houston's announcement) More...


What if we had functions compile(String sourceCode) and runCompiled(BinaryData compiledCode)? What could you do with it? Could it act as a closure, and bring really dynamic coding to traditionally static languages, perhaps allowing dynamically named variables and functions to languages without them (and much more!)? Could we store our code in a database and mix and match chunks, building programs based on a SQL query?

What do you think? Useful or useless?


Peter Bell's presentation on LightWire generated some comments I found very interesting and thought provoking. (Perhaps Peter is not simply into application generation, but comment generation as well.)

The one I find most interesting is brought up by several people whose opinions I value - Joe Rinehart, Sean Corfield, Jared Rypka-Hauer, and others during and after the presentation. That is: what is the distinction between code and data, and specifically, is XML code or data (assuming there is a difference)? More...


It might be petty, but those two three-letter words really get to me. They clutter my code almost as much as semicolons, Object obj = new Object() // assign a new object to the object called "obj" which is is of type Object, and angle brackets. I'm want to do something like newCodebase=rereplace(entireCodebase,"[gs]et","","all").

What if we had a new idiom where calling the method without arguments would cause it to return a value (the get), while calling it with an argument would run the setter? Its easy enough to do. What do you think, am I off my head?


Due to a couple of requests in the comments about Sorting really BIG files, I'm posting the Java source code that does the job.

First, we have the main externalSort algorithm. It expects parameters relation (the name of a table, which in this case is the .csv file to sort without the ".csv" in the file name) and the column to sort on (it checks the first row of the .csv file for the value passed). Now, of course that is easy enough to change to fit your own needs - it worked fine for me and my CSVs.

There is a magic number in there that you might want to pull out: 10000. That is the number of rows to read at a time. Clearly, ten thousand rows is way smaller than we would want to sort on - depending on how many characters are in each row, we could probably quite easily fit 10 million rows into memory. But, I didn't want to spend time generating 100 million row files to test this on - so I just tried it with 100 thousand or so. For a real use scenario, you'd probably want to go with something bigger - if not even calculate the size and average row length. More...


Have any of you Java guys or gals seen or tried JUnit Factory from Agitar? It generates functional unit tests for each method in a given class. A good description of how this can be used (since it can't detect how you expect the code should work, only how it does work) is provided in the FAQ: More...


One of the great benefits of using a framework (in the general sense) is the freedom in portability it often gives you. Rather than writing your own Ajax routines which would need to handle browser incompatibilities, you can rely on Prototype/Scriptaculous, AjaxCFC, Spry, or a seemingly infinite number of Ajax frameworks available. We see the same phenomenon in our use of ColdFusion, which uses Java to be cross-platform. And, you can get the benefit for databases by using a framework like Transfer or Reactor or ActiveRecord in Ruby (all also have a slew of other benefits). In general, we're simply seeing an abstracting away of the differences between low-level things so we can think at a much higher level than "oh crap, what if they're using Lynx!" (Ok, I'm doubting any of those Ajax frameworks fully support Lynx =), but you get the picture) More...


It had been a while since I visited InfoQ, but the other day I got one of their mailings in my inbox, and tons of it was relevant to my interests (even more so than normal). Rather than having a separate post for all of it, I decided to combine much of it into this post.

First, this post let me know that Thoughtworks has released CruiseControl.rb, which is good news for Ruby users who also want continuous integration. I've yet to use it, but those guys are a great company and it seems like everything they touch turns to gold. More...


Yesterday I was working on a little Java program that, when given a table, a "possible" candidate key (which could be composite), and some non-key columns would check to see if the table was in 1st, 2nd, or 3rd normal form(s). One constraint is that this program needs to be procedural in style (or rather, all of my code must reside in the file that contains the main() function).

I started out with the pseudocode programming process in psvm. My listing started to look like: More...


One of the things I've been dreading is getting Rails to work with IIS, although it appears to be getting easier (last time I checked, there was no such "seamless integration"). But eWeek has some good news. They note that core developer on the JRuby project, Charles Nutter
said the JRuby project will announce, possibly as soon as this week, that JRuby supports the popular Ruby on Rails Web development framework. Ruby on Rails is sometimes referred to as RoR or simply Rails.

"We're trying to finish off the last few test cases so we can claim that more than 95 percent of core Rails tests passed across the board," Nutter said.

Moreover, the JRuby team is inviting Rails developers to try out real-world usage of JRuby and help them find any Rails issues the unit tests do not cover, or any remaining failures that are crucial for real applications, Nutter said.

Support for Ruby on Rails is important because "once Rails can run on JVM alongside other Java apps, existing Java shops will have a vector to bringing Rails apps into their organizations. They won't have to toss out the existing investment in servers and software to go with the new kid on the block," Nutter said.
The article also mentions "Microsoft is looking at support for Ruby developers and broader uses of Ruby, including having it run on the CLR."

Both bits of good news for fans of Ruby who want it to play well with Windows and IIS. Not to mention that using JRuby (or NRuby, if it will be called that for .NET) should open up all of those libraries available to Java/.NET developers, which has been considered by some to be one of Ruby's weaker spots.


On Monday (Jan. 29, 2007) we had our first meeting of the UH Code Dojo, and it was a lot of fun. Before we started, I was scared that I'd be standing there programming all by myself, with no input from the other members. But, my fear was immediately laid to rest. Not only did everyone participate a lot, one of the members, Matt (I didn't catch his last name), even took over the typing duties after about 45 minutes. That turned out to be a good thing - since I still can't type worth a crap on my laptop, and he was much faster than me.

Now, it had only been a couple of months since I last used Java - but it still amazes me how little time off you need to forget simple things, like "import" for "require." I found myself having several silly syntax errors for things as small as forgetting the semicolon at the end of the lines.

Overall, we started with 7 people, and had 5 for most of the meeting. We finished with four because one person had tons of homework to do. It seemed like those five of us who stayed were genuinely enjoying ourselves.

In any case, we decided to stick with the original plan of developing a tic-tac-toe game. You would think that a bunch of computer scientists could develop the whole game in the two hours we were there. But, you'd have been wrong.

I came away from the meeting learning two main points, which I think illustrate the main reasons we didn't complete the game:
  1. YAGNI is your friend
  2. Writing your tests first, and really checking them is very worthwhile
More...


I've seen a couple of posts around the ColdFusion world lately about the programming language, Groovy (which runs on the JVM). If you're interested in learning Groovy and using it for web application development, the framework Grails is for you. And even better, InfoQ has just released Getting Started with Grails. It's a free 131-page PDF mini-book available for download now. You can also buy the print version for just under 20 bucks.


One of my guilty pleasures is reading The Daily WTF?!. I just saw this Java snippet, and wanted to share:

int x = new Integer( 0 ).intValue();

someMethod( new Integer( x ) );

I laughed my ass off when I read it. Then, of course, I had to have a laugh at myself, because I've written code like that. Within the last six months.

I did have an excuse though. For some reason, the compiler was complaining that it couldn't cast an int to an Integer (or vice versa). Then it was saying the opposite within the function. So I had to wrap and unwrap it. The weird thing was it was only giving this error on one machine.

As I recall, we just had to switch a compiler version in Eclipse to fix it. But, I still wrote it.


Do you find yourself writing more classes in other languages than in Coldfusion? I do. For instance, I certainly develop more classes in Java than Coldfusion.

Is it due to the fact that I've developed bad habits in CF and haven't yet broken out of them (i.e., I'm just unable to spot needs for new classes) or is it because CF is so much more high-level than Java? A third option may be that the performance issues with instantiating CFCs contribute to me not wanting to break out? More...


Just finished writing a survey on some of relatively current literature on k-means, focusing on introducing it, some practical applications of it, some difficulties in it, and how to find k, the number of clusters. I'm still new to the area, so don't expect much groundbreaking to be done.

The second half focuses on my own experiment, trying to find k using two similar, but slightly different techniques. I failed, but if you'd like to go over it and either laugh at me, or perhaps figure out what I've done wrong, you are free to. =)

Obviously, this isn't going to interest many people, so I didn't take time to mark it up - it's just available as a DOC (I had planned on having a PDF version, but my PDF writer has taken a crap on me). If you don't have Word or Open Office, and would like to read it, contact me and I'll try to get the PDF for you in some way or another.

Anyway, the DOC is here if you want to read it. It's over 3600 words, so beware!

I'm interested to know if anyone has built any machine learning libraries or done anything with machine learning in Coldfusion? My immediate thought is "no way!" because I don't think Coldfusion has the performance for it. But, I wouldn't know, since I haven't tried it. Have you? What's been your experience? Drop me a line if you care to.


There's been an ongoing discussion in the Coldfusion community for quite some time now regarding the use of XML for configuration files to your applications. More recently, Peter Bell has written quite a few posts about it in The Benefits of XML Config Files (and why I don't use them), Configuration Files vs. Scripts, and most recently, Should you use XML for you configuration files?

He references Hal Helms, Joe Rinehart (and thanks Jim Collins who wrote (or co-wrote?) config.cfc for these), and Martin Fowler.

This post was sort of "sparked" by Jim's release of config.cfc, then my ensuing question about "when and why" I would want to use it (and no, I didn't mean it to sound that provocative), and then Peter's response to which this post title is addressed as "regarding."

I'm a little late to the party, but I thought I'd chime in nevertheless. More...


It may be that I'm still so new to Java that I don't know a good way around this, or it may be that I'm so used to the convenience of Coldfusion that I build tools in Java to help it act more like Coldfusion, but I was having some trouble with MVC in Java. I didn't see why something in my View layer should be importing anything from the package java.sql, such as ResultSet.

Moreover, I wanted to open and close my Connection to the database (and the Statement/PreparedStatement in the Model layer, and doing so would have prevented the ResultSet from being available to the View.

Enter QueryResult. QueryResult simply takes as a parameter a ResultSet and creates a HashMap where each key is a column name, and accessing it gives you an array of the rows' values for that column.

Thus you can get the fifth row of the column email by doing this:

QueryResult qr = new QueryResult(someResultSet);
String emailInRow4 = (String) qr.get("email")[4];

It's not the greatest thing in the world, but it works better than the alternative. I plan to put the code up here for it later, so maybe it could help someone else as well.



Google
Web CodeOdor.com

Me
Picture of me

Topics
.NET (19)
AI/Machine Learning (14)
Answers To 100 Interview Questions (10)
Bioinformatics (2)
Business (1)
C and C++ (6)
cfrails (22)
ColdFusion (78)
Customer Relations (15)
Databases (3)
DRY (18)
DSLs (11)
Future Tech (5)
Games (5)
Groovy/Grails (8)
Hardware (1)
IDEs (9)
Java (38)
JavaScript (4)
Linux (2)
Lisp (1)
Mac OS (4)
Management (15)
MediaServerX (1)
Miscellany (75)
OOAD (37)
Productivity (11)
Programming (168)
Programming Quotables (9)
Rails (31)
Ruby (67)
Save Your Job (58)
scriptaGulous (4)
Software Development Process (23)
TDD (41)
TDDing xorblog (6)
Tools (5)
Web Development (7)
Windows (1)
With (1)
YAGNI (10)

Resources
Agile Manifesto & Principles
Principles Of OOD
ColdFusion
CFUnit
Ruby
Ruby on Rails
JUnit



RSS 2.0: Full Post | Short Blurb
Subscribe by email:

Delivered by FeedBurner